I. EMS PLUS PREVENTION:
REACTIVE AND PROACTIVE STRATEGIES
THAT WORK TOGETHER
WHAT IS "PROACTIVE EMS"?
Proactive EMS combines the resources of EMS with the strategies of injury prevention and injury control. EMS provides knowledgeable, professional people and patient care records that contain valuable clues about the causes of preventable traumatic events. Using these we can identify the preventable injuries and correct the hazards that cause them. Injury prevention and injury control provide effective strategies, scientifically proven to prevent injury events from happening, or to reduce the injuring energy exchange during the event in order to lessen the severity. As a team, EMS and injury prevention/injury control (IP/IC) are a natural combination that work together to eliminate some fatal injuries before they happen, and to provide EMS with less critical patients by reducing the severity of injuries. The result is a dramatic reduction in traumatic fatalities.
EMS is a "Downstream," reactive strategy: We wait for an injury event to occur somewhere upstream, and then we react to the situation that we find when we arrive, farther downstream. With EMS we attempt to prevent any further injury to the patient, to minimize the damage that has already been done, and to halt the progression of shock syndrome from destroying vital organs. Therefore EMS is truly injury control after the fact (in the "post-injury phase").
EMS is designed to respond to, care for and transport injured patients that have some chance of survival.
EMT’s are responsible for saving many thousands of lives every year. However, we cannot save those who have no chance of survival, and we can only save some of those whose chances are poor or fair. Despite our best efforts, there are some patients who will not make it. Nobody likes to admit defeat when there’s nothing to be done, and nobody likes to lose a patient we’ve tried hard to save, but it happens all the time.Downstream strategies do not control the problem; they attempt to control the aftermath of the problem. The injury has to happen first and then we react to it as best we can. If the patient has already expired, or has received wounds that are not compatible with life, EMS will fail every time. If the patient is critically unstable, and their life is in the balance, then the many variables of that particular situation come into play. So basically the unstable patient is at the mercy of luck, our skill, and "God’s grace in a long handled spoon." (Thanks to my friend Doc Holliday Sr. for that useful piece of wisdom from my childhood.) These patients must receive the very best care from the time EMS arrives until they completely stabilize, or they won’t make it. Out in the country, this can be a very long time. There are potential pitfalls that are completely out of the EMT’s control all along the way. Even after the patient reaches surgery, their life depends on God's grace for a long time.
Reactive strategies are complex and require a lot of manpower. They are also very expensive to improve. While it may be possible to upgrade your EMS, put on more personnel, open up bases in the outlying parts of the district, improve the local hospital’s treatment of critical pediatric trauma, establish on call surgery, etc., these improvements will still not save any people who are already dead, and they will only save some of those who are unstable.
INJURY PREVENTION and INJURY CONTROL: PROACTIVE STRATEGIES
"Recognition of the recurring patterns that cause fatal injuries give us clues to strategies that may prevent the injury event from happening (injury prevention), or control the amount of damage caused by the event, without reducing the incidence (injury control)." (Robertson, 1992)
Injury prevention and injury control are proactive or "Upstream" strategies:
Injuries that recur in the same place, under the same circumstances, and among the same population are often the result of an identifiable hazard. Injury prevention is a process of seeking out these hazards and eliminating them. Injury prevention takes place in the "upstream," or "pre-injury phase" before the injury event occurs. A hazard is identified and removed or modified in order to prevent any further injurious events from happening there. Re-engineering a deceptive turn in the road, removing a fixed object along the highway, and lighting a dark area in a residential zone that has a high incidence of night time auto vs. pedestrian fatalities are all examples of effective injury prevention. The modification removes the hazard and therefore prevents all future injury events from occurring at that location.
An excellent example of the effectiveness of injury prevention is childhood poisoning by medication. "An especially steep decline in childhood poisoning death rates occurred after childproof packaging was required on all drugs and medications beginning in 1973. The 50 percent decrease in poisoning by all drugs and medications in the first three years (1973-1976) was substantially greater than the decrease in poisonings by other solids and liquids, most of which were not required to be packaged in childproof containers…. During 1968-1979, the period analyzed for most causes of death in this book, the 80 percent decline in poisoning death rates (emphasis added) for children ages 1-4 exceeded that for any other major cause of childhood injury death." (Haddon, W. Jr. 1984. Forward to the Injury Fact Book, First Edition)
Injury control occurs during the actual injury event itself. Some environmental modification is made before the injury event that increases the protection to the patient during the event. Air bags are a good example of injury control. Just as many front-end collisions occur, but fewer result in fatal injuries because the air bags cushion the occupants during the crash.
Many injury control modifications have been made to vehicles over the years that have reduced the number of fatalities in motor vehicle crashes dramatically. Collapsible steering columns, padded dashboards, and safety glass are all mandatory injury control improvements that have been introduced into legislation by injury researchers. Prior to that time, being impaled on the steering column, crushing your legs and torso on the dashboard, and being beheaded by the windshield was a common occurrence in otherwise survivable crashes. From 1966 to 1970 the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, directed by William Haddon Jr. M.D, spearheaded these and other legislated injury control modifications to motor vehicles. These modifications have been directly responsible for a vast reduction in motor vehicle crash deaths. Even the most conservative estimate of 10,000 lives saved per year works out to a handy sum of about 250,000 people saved to date because of these improvements in the crashworthiness and more forgiving interior surfaces of passenger vehicles. Dr. Haddon went on to serve as the President of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety from 1969 until his death in 1985. That institute continues to carry on the great tradition begun by Dr. Haddon by performing yearly crash worthiness testing on all new vehicles. You may be familiar with their testing from their reports and yearly television specials. For more information you may visit their web site at: http://www.hwysafety.org/